Here and now
It is strange
that in modern times with all our technological advances and understanding of
how nature / technology works … there are still 30% of all adult males
circumcised (thereof two-thirds being Muslims). The current male circumcision
rate is about 5,000 per day, or 1,8 million per year.
For female circumcision (all types): about 200 million girls and woman have suffered some form of female genital mutilation, and about three million are considered at risk of undergoing FGM annually. Source: https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research/areas-of-work/female-genital-mutilation/prevalence-of-female-genital-mutilation
All this means that ancient rites and traditions are still a significant ‘indicator’ of humanity (better: human conditions). So, on the one hand quantum computers and on the other: ‘knifes and stones’ (including surgical tools).
And not to
forget: at least two monotheistic religions do not conceive male
circumcision (and partially also
female circumcision) as ‘inhumane’ and therefore forbidden, on the
contrary, the are more or less obliged to do this in the name of their God.
Circumcision of Abraham, from the Bible of Jean
de Sy, ca. 1355-1357, between circa 1355 and circa 1357. Source: https://ru.pinterest.com/pin/498281146250652156/.
Public Domain
Jewish religion: male circumcision is a prerequisite for their holy covenant with God
Islam: here, the situation is a bit trickier, because it is recognized that male and female circumcision had been around long before their religion was established. For male circumcision: they follow the rules of Abraham.
Islam: for female circumcision: they (partially) kept tribal and community rites and integrated them into their religion and made them acceptable as ‘not strictly demanded’ but ‘honorable’ to do. Though there have been quite some Fatwas against female circumcision, not much has changed (see citations: Master Thesis Dörthe Engels: The Islamic Law Assessment of Female Circumcision).
Anonymous Beschneidung Christi. Kunsthistorisches Museum; circa 1490 to 1500 ; copyright holder: Belvedere, Wien; RKDimages, Art-work number 264894. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license
Christianity: male genital circumcision was strongly disfavored and the focus was on the ‘circumcision of the heart’. But it must be noted that the Orthodox Churches practiced male circumcision after the 12th century (or earlier) and that Coptic Christians in Egypt used to practice female circumcision, see: https://copticliterature.wordpress.com/2014/03/12/prevalence-of-and-support-for-female-genital-mutilation-within-the-copts-of-egypt-unicef-report-2013/
OK, so this means that male circumcision will not go away anytime soon, probably never.
What about FGM: I regret to say that I don’t expect to see much progress in the next 10 to 20 years. Why: because it needs to change the societal and cultural settings of many of the African countries / tribes / families. How long will it take: 50 years, 100 ?
HMG was and still is done for (alleged) ‘health purposes’ as well as for many other reasons like: group and ethnical identity, rite of passage, prevention of masturbation, and for FGM/C: cultural value of virginity, value for marriage, social acceptance.
And yet, we (I) should do our best to follow the recommendations of the WHO, i.e.to focus on:
·
strengthening the health sector response: developing and implementing guidelines, tools,
training and policy to ensure that health care providers can provide medical
care and counselling to girls and women living with FGM and communicate for
prevention of the practice;
· building evidence: generating knowledge about the causes, consequences and costs of the practice, including why health care providers carry out the practice, how to abandon the practice, and how to care for those who have experienced FGM;
· increasing advocacy: developing publications and advocacy tools for international, regional and local efforts to end FGM, including tools for policy makers and advocates to estimate the health burden of FGM and the potential public health benefits and cost savings of preventing FGM.
Comments
Post a Comment