Conspiracy Myths (3) - Ad-hominem Attacks
Ad-hominem Attacks (attacking a person)
One is to
publicly question their ability to follow the proposed arguments (though they
are illogical) and blame them for being uncapable (or unwilling) to do so. This
attitude is often sustained by spreading (through social media) negative
statements about the opponent, like: not trustworthy, unethical, stubborn
fundamentalist, fanatic, lunatic, only cui-bono-driven, biased, not qualified,
industry-paid.
This is
often times done in a subversive way, e.g., when ‘just’ saying that other
people hold this opinion. On the other hand, wrong statements can be uttered
blatantly and repeated again and again: Obama was not born on American soil. Or:
many world leaders are in reality shape-shifting reptilian aliens taking on
human form.
Key is to
repeat these statements over and over again (ad nauseam) and in different ways
to make them stick to the audience, since a statement becomes truer and more convincing
the more often it is repeated (most recent example: we won the election by a
landslide, or: this election was rigged).
Another
method is called ‘poisoning of the well’.
For example, if an anti-abortionist calls this praxis ‘Holocaust’ and
their opponents ‘Nazis’. It is obvious that the right for abortion should not
in any meaningful way be compared to the Holocaust, but the naming serves the
purpose of discrediting the opponents. Another example: if someone who is in
favor of separating state and church is called a ‘secular Taliban’. Arguments
may be forgotten, but the name sticks ‘forever’.
So again: just spread
upfront (e.g., through social media) some ‘rumors’ or ‘other people’s opinion’
about the opponent, e.g., not trustworthy, unethical, stubborn fundamentalist,
fanatic, lunatic, only cui-bono-driven, biased, not qualified, industry-paid.
Comments
Post a Comment